Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 27485
  • 1 Comment
  • Print

The 2012 “Masters in Logistics” Study highlights how Larger Shippers are using Transportation Strategy as a Competitive Weapon

For over two decades the University of Tennessee has been conducting its Masters in Logistics research study.  This year the study was undertaken in partnership with Con-way Inc., Ernst & Young, and Logistics Management.  The U.S. based participants accounted for an estimated $30.1 billion in domestic transportation expenditures and over $20.5 billion in international transportation.  Some 1,370 domestic and global logistics, transportation, and supply chain management professionals participated in the study.  A summary of the report appears in the current issue of Logistics Management and is the basis of this blog.

The Masters of Logistics, those companies with annual freight spend in excess of $3 billion, represented 27.8 percent of the study participants. Medium-sized firms, with between $500 million and $3 billion in annual revenue, were 20.6 percent of respondents. The majority of respondents (51.6 percent) were smaller firms with reported annual revenue less than $500 million.  The study participants came from a broad array of industries.

 The results identify the emergence of an idea advocated for over a decade, and one which is being put into place by the Masters of Logistics: Use logistics and transportation services to differentiate yourself in the marketplace. As the study suggests, being able to deliver differentiated service is not possible without a value-creating partnership between the shipper and its strategic carriers; in turn, this has created a unique balance of power between the two parties.

Overall transportation spending as a percent of sales increased from 2011 to 2012. The data showed that companies that spent more than 5 percent of sales on domestic transportation increased year-over-year, rising from 21.2 percent to 26.7 percent in 2012.  The key reason is the change in strategic direction for many companies. Following several years of intense cost cutting, particularly in transportation spending, the 2012 study results point towards companies shifting some of their focus to maximizing profitability and asset utilization. In the meantime, the percentage of respondents who reported that their primary objective is reducing costs has shrunk each of the past three years—findings that reveal that shippers again believe that you have to “spend money to make money”.

Being able to rapidly respond to changing customer requirements is becoming increasingly critical for both shippers and carriers. Today, more than ever, transportation plays a key role in helping companies attain that necessary level of responsiveness. The study indicates that some 71.6 percent of respondents are either capable or highly capable of adjusting transportation operations in response to changing conditions—and this ability to alter and adapt is greater for transportation than for logistics operations.  ‘Total Delivered Cost” is becoming the value creation metric and competitive differentiator among carriers.

The need to create more value is reflected in how shippers are utilizing the various modal combinations.  Truckload transportation still accounts for the largest share of the transportation budget. In addition to being highly responsive to changing conditions, it enables companies to address concerns about fuel costs that ultimately impact the cost to serve and the total landed cost. LTL accounted for 17.3 percent of the transportation budget in 2012, representing the second largest modal expenditure for firms.  However, this is a decline of 2.7 percentage points from 2011. The decline in LTL was the largest change reported for any of the modes for 2012. The study found that part of this decline in spending was used to boost the budget for private fleet. After a slight dip in the percent of the transportation budget in 2011, the expenditures for private fleets are almost on par with the 2010 level. Rail’s portion of the transportation budget remained essentially the same year-over-year while intermodal increased in 2012 accounting for 4.3 percent of total spend.

In the current shipping environment where supply and demand are in fairly close balance, there is a requirement to have a capacity strategy.  Tommy Barnes, president of Con-way Multimodal mentioned that “companies, both shippers and carriers, are looking for a way to use the right capacity in the right geographical places. Using a multimodal strategy can fill that gap.”

Shippers are taking five actions to improve transportation efficiency.

  • Shipment consolidation
  • Core (strategic) carriers
  • “Spot” bidding for freight
  • Route planning
  • Carrier tracking

 Of the five, the study suggests that the most promising one is the use of core or strategic carriers. To be successful, both shippers and carriers must be fully committed to the relationship. The efficiency initiatives suggest that shippers are making use of multiple methods to keep transportation costs in check. “Logistics and transportation efficiencies will help create a competitive advantage for small- and large-sized shippers,” says Barnes. “The efficiencies can drive logistics and transportation productivity and eliminate risk, thus allowing organizations to focus on customer/supplier value.”

Many factors have caused shippers to change the way they manage logistics and supply chain activities. The main influences according to the results from this year’s study are: 

• ability to respond to changing customer requirements;

• energy (fuel) prices;

• cost to serve (specifically distribution);

• inventory reduction;

• and total landed costs.

The results of this year’s study suggest that the nature of the relationship between carriers and shippers has fundamentally shifted.  Study participants are in strong agreement that being better than their competitors in terms of service would significantly improve their competitive position. There is also an awareness that while logistics and transportation service will differentiate them in the marketplace, it does not allow them to charge customers a premium price—hence the need for carriers and shippers to work together to create the former without incurring the latter.

The study results show an emerging trend by the Masters of Logistics to set themselves apart from their competitors through differentiated service. Transportation plays a critical role in enabling the firm to deliver differentiated service of which a prominent feature is being able to respond to changing conditions. As such, it positions transportation as a vital part of value creation.  For more on the study, pick up the latest issue of Logistics Management

0

Comments

  • Guest
    Barbara Moori Friday, 09 November 2012

    Truck Factoring

    Very informative post on transportation market, their budget and their supply and demand. Shipper to manage their transport have to mainly focus on customer needs.

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 26 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Canada truck drivers Wal-Mart selling trucking companies employee termination Digitization Geopolitics freight cost savings US Auto Sales USA Truck Blogging digital freight matching Donald Trump Transloading bulk shipping truck driver Freight Rates 2014 economic forecast LCV's CN KCS Social Media in Transportation Whole Foods ELD Surety bond Canadian freight market shipping Retail Training New Hires Freight Shuttle System natural disasters University of Tennessee freight marketplace Schneider Logistics CN Rail New York Times FCPC Freight contracts future of freight industry last mile delivery Truckload transportation newspaper 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad FMCSA Derek Singleton carrier conference Sales Training Failure Training MBA Grocery dynamic pricing Masters in Logistics shipper-carrier collaboration small parcel Doug Nix technology Habs Transport Capital Partners (TCP) Cleveland Cavaliers Coronavirus freight transportation conference China Anti-Vax automation Toronto Maple Leafs Leadership 2014 freight forecast Railway Association of Canada Carriers Value Proposition trade Reshoring transportation audit CSA recession Emergent Strategy derailments Fire Phone mentoring trucking company acquisitions shipper-carrier contracts MPG Dedicated Contract Carriage Canada's global strategy Blockchain Conway Tracy Matura Trump Amazon computer security freight costs freight payment freight audit asset management freight audit professional drivers Bobby Harris dimensional pricing Infrastructure Comey Consulting freight payment NS financial management Werner peak season Covid-19 Social Media buying trucking companies Scott Monty Packaging risk management President Obama Freight Management Education BNSF Climate Change UP Swift Spanx Business skills home delibery pipelines TMP Worldwide online shopping consumer centric Impeachment Retail transportation small business Justice broker bonds Tariffs Inbound Transportation energy efficiency Keystone Pipeline LinkedIn CRM e-commerce Loblaw supply chain management Crude Oil by Rail transportation news Trucker Protest TransForce driver shortages home delivery CP Rail freight forwarders RFP Electric Vehicles US Manufacturing Harper Davos speech Warehousing Software Advice routing guide Freight Matching Business Development dark stores cyber security YRCW Finance and Transportation coaching US Election LTL Dan Goodwill Distribution Crisis management capacity shortages NCC Transportation Buying Trends Survey 2014 freight volumes customer engagement laptop autos freight agreements Associates Sales Management Canadian economy CSA scores 2015 Economic Forecast Freight Carriers Association of Canada the future of transportation Hudsons Bay Company drones Twitter Digital Freight Networks broker security IANA APL EBOR Success failure entrepreneur freight transportation ProMiles Hockey Freight BlueGrace Logistics Rotman School of Business 3PLTL driver pay truck capacity rail safety 360ideaspace Map-21 FCA Business Strategy Doug Davis Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC Canadian truckers Search engine optimization US Economy computer CSX Success capacity shortage Omni Channel Freight Capacity solutions provider driver Broker Load broker CITA Shipper Pulse Survey freight rate increases Trucking Ferromex Government marketing Toronto Entrepreneur Politics David Tuttle Adrian Gonzalez freight broker Celadon Canadian Transportation & Logistics USMCA Transportation Management Uber Freight Canadian Protests economic forecasts for 2012 Global experience shipping wine General Motors Sales Strategy network optimization FMS NMFC cheap oil Stephen Harper Trade Vision freight transportation in 2011 $75000 bond NAFTA Colilers International economy business security US Housing Market Shipper Transplace Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration JB Hunt robotics economic outlook FuelQuest cars Business Transformation Strategy Canada U.S. trade Driver Shortage ShipMax Facebook Deferred Packaging Outsourcing Sales Career Advice Montreal Canadiens Leafs freight RFP intermodal Load Boards Job satisfaction Regina Driving for Profit Muhammad Ali freight bid Accessorial Charges Transcom Fleet Leasing Sales Freight Recession Rate per Mile shipper-carrier roundtable Rail 3PL Transportation service hiring process Life Lessons fuel surcharge computer protection autonomous vehicles Yield Improvement Otto Dedicated Trucking Online grocery shopping Right Shoring tanker cars Global Transportation Hub driverless business start-up 2013 Economic Forecast TMS Microsoft

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January