Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Best Practices in Freight Management
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2365
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Managing Inbound Transportation – Part 2 – Action Steps to Save Money on Freight

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_27385956.jpg

The first blog in this series looked at the money saving opportunities for organizations that take control of Inbound Transportation. This blog will outline a series of steps that need to be taken to make this happen.

A Commitment to Act

In the last blog, it was highlighted that some vendors place a mark-up on their outbound freight costs (viz. your company’s inbound freight expenses) and pass it on to their customers. It is important for every company that receives inbound freight to understand the following.

A trucking company adds a mark-up to their costs in order to come up with their freight rates. A freight broker and/or logistics service provider will take the carrier’s rate and add another mark-up. In other words, by the time you receive shipments from your vendors, they may have from two to four mark-ups added to the basic cost.

We can all understand why a shipper will add a mark-up to their production costs to cover overhead and profit. But should you be paying mark-ups that vendors apply to your freight costs?

Some shippers will argue that freight costs can range from 3 to 10% of revenue. Why worry about an additional one or two percent increase in freight costs? If your company isn’t concerned about these costs, then there is no need to read the rest of this blog. If your company is trying to reduce or eliminate these charges, then pushing back on these discretionary freight cost mark-ups is totally in order.

Transparency and Data

The next step is to obtain data on your actual inbound freight costs. This includes two sets of data, the rates charged by the carriers moving your vendor’s goods from origin to your facilities and the mark-ups being applied. In some cases, this may involve securing purchase order data. This historical data needs to be captured in some sort of electronic fashion so you can look at total costs, markups and the markup as a percent of the freight cost, by vendor. Some vendors may be reluctant to share this information.

It will be helpful if you can organize this data so you can sort the spreadsheet by size of vendor, total freight costs and percentage mark-ups. To determine if there are potential savings, there is a requirement to secure rate quotes from your current carrier base and from some additional carriers if your current carriers don’t service any of these lanes. Since the rates you receive will be tied to the potential volumes that the carriers may receive, this data may need to be shared with the carriers in an RFP format.

Once you have inserted the carrier rate quotes into your analysis model, you are then able to identify where there may potential savings. Coming out of this exercise will be a short list of potential cost saving opportunities.

Carrier and Vendor Negotiations

Knowledge is power. The results of this analysis will highlight where you have leverage and where you don’t. There may be lanes where you cannot obtain carrier pricing that is better than what your vendors are paying. Large vendors may be able to negotiate better rates than you can on some blocks of business.

Every company going through this exercise needs to make a determination as to where to focus their efforts. Typically, there will be some high volume vendors where the saving potential is worth pursuing and others that are marginal and where the effort may exceed the reward.

Armed with this data, a manufacturer can then arrange a series of meetings with vendors and carriers. In some cases, there will be a requirement to change the terms of sale (i.e. switch from prepaid to collect). Some vendors may prefer to negotiate the margins rather than lose shipping volumes on certain lanes. In other cases where there are limited vendors for certain commodities, a manufacturer may choose a different strategy (i.e. change their marketing and/or pricing strategies to their customers) to make up the margin erosion.

Implementation

There are several components to a successful implementation. The carriers need to be notified of routing and billing changes and dates need to be established to ensure a smooth transition. The company’s routing guide needs to be updated and loaded into the TMS system. A tracking system needs to be implemented to monitor the cost savings. For companies that receive a high volume of inbound freight, the financial benefits are worth the effort.

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 28 March 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

freight forwarders Fire Phone Canadian freight market KCS computer security Masters in Logistics natural disasters Government David Tuttle driverless Swift digital freight matching trucking company acquisitions Crisis management FCA freight costs Business skills energy efficiency Harper Davos speech CP Rail Failure freight transportation conference US Economy Leafs MBA freight cost savings Wal-Mart Search engine optimization transportation audit Success employee termination Keystone Pipeline Packaging shipping Freight Carriers Association of Canada marketing Coronavirus Surety bond USMCA Life Lessons Transportation Buying Trends Survey Freight contracts freight bid Dedicated Contract Carriage risk management Job satisfaction Comey Transportation freight agreements transportation news cheap oil Twitter CSA Climate Change derailments recession robotics truck driver freight rate increases Freight Management Outsourcing Sales Anti-Vax the future of transportation Toronto Maple Leafs NCC Celadon Deferred Packaging business start-up Entrepreneur solutions provider Doug Nix freight audit FMCSA General Motors Colilers International Dedicated Trucking transportation newspaper Donald Trump Toronto future of freight industry Load broker peak season Yield Improvement autos Omni Channel freight payment freight audit Training New Hires Canadian Transportation & Logistics Driving for Profit Transplace Impeachment Shipper 3PLTL dark stores Sales Management Education Social Media in Transportation small business Transport Capital Partners (TCP) Software Advice freight marketplace driver shortages driver pay network optimization Schneider Logistics Facebook US Manufacturing financial management Global Transportation Hub routing guide LinkedIn Management Freight Capacity Electric Vehicles freight broker Hudsons Bay Company TransForce APL Transloading Microsoft supply chain management CSA scores Right Shoring 3PL technology USA Truck freight transportation in 2011 CN Rail Habs truck drivers IANA Social Media JB Hunt consumer centric Business Strategy shipper-carrier contracts Werner coaching Warehousing carrier conference Railway Association of Canada 360ideaspace Covid-19 trade Trucker Protest Freight Matching Amazon CSX Rail small parcel 2015 Economic Forecast pipelines Dan Goodwill Driver Shortage NMFC New York Times Infrastructure Broker professional drivers Load Boards Reshoring Business Development e-commerce Carriers Canadian economy $75000 bond ShipMax freight RFP economic forecasts for 2012 Blockchain capacity shortages Conway Online grocery shopping economic outlook CITA Shipper Pulse Survey Doug Davis BlueGrace Logistics Sales Strategy TMS Stephen Harper Trade Vision Trump customer engagement cyber security Derek Singleton Associates Freight Recession Uber Freight CRM Global experience bulk shipping Adrian Gonzalez Retail Truckload Transcom Fleet Leasing Value Proposition RFP Finance and Transportation mentoring Success failure entrepreneur selling trucking companies cars BNSF Muhammad Ali shipper-carrier collaboration NAFTA capacity shortage FCPC Whole Foods 2014 freight volumes Canadian Protests autonomous vehicles Justice driver rail safety broker security US Auto Sales Trucking 2013 Economic Forecast home delibery freight payment Geopolitics Cleveland Cavaliers computer Regina Montreal Canadiens Grocery Politics MPG YRCW dimensional pricing drones Consulting Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration Blogging Digital Freight Networks laptop Map-21 Transportation service Canadian truckers Career Advice ProMiles Hockey Canada's global strategy intermodal Leadership Sales 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad FMS Canada U.S. trade Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC 2014 freight forecast FuelQuest tanker cars Business Transformation Strategy Distribution UP EBOR NS last mile delivery Digitization Sales Training online shopping Scott Monty computer protection Retail transportation Loblaw freight transportation Accessorial Charges buying trucking companies Freight US Election Crude Oil by Rail automation Inbound Transportation LCV's shipper-carrier roundtable Ferromex President Obama truck capacity University of Tennessee Canada Tariffs Rate per Mile asset management Freight Shuttle System economy Spanx China 2014 economic forecast Tracy Matura Rotman School of Business Otto broker bonds TMP Worldwide hiring process shipping wine ELD CN Emergent Strategy Freight Rates business security US Housing Market Bobby Harris LTL home delivery Training fuel surcharge dynamic pricing

Blog Archives

March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January