Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Freight Bids
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2306
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Get your “House in Order” Before Conducting a Freight Bid

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_49290215.jpg

One of the most frequent complaints I hear from carriers, in person, on social media, or at conferences, is about the number and quality of freight bids that they receive. Carriers complain about the poor quality of the data, the number of carriers in the bid, and about the lack of professionalism in the bid process. They also assert that if the shipper would just meet with them face to face, rather than through a bid process, the result would be more successful for both parties and would take a lot less time, money and effort.

My company has designed and executed many successful bids over the past fourteen years. We have learned that for many shippers, success comes from getting “your house in order” before executing the bid. This is what is involved.

Many shippers have been moving the same freight, to the same consignees, using the same processes, for several years. In their haste to put their freight out for bid, they overlook certain aspects of their business.

A company's product portfolio evolves over time.  New products are introduced as old ones are retired. Miniaturization and packaging changes can have significant impacts on freight densities, and as a by-product, freight rates.  It is essential for shippers to obtain precise calculations of updated product densities before launching a bid exercise.

Businesses change over time. New divisions are added while others may be closed or sold. This may alter freight flows.  Some companies overlook the opportunity to merge their freight with their new sister or acquired divisions to improve their negotiating leverage. In other cases, new pool or consolidation points may evolve.

We sometimes find companies that experience a deterioration in their business volumes. Poor economic or competitive conditions may reduce shipping volumes and leverage. This can necessitate combining volumes with competitive shippers, forming industry associations or taking other creative approaches to make their freight more attractive to carriers.

Shippers should also look at their order fulfillment processes and cycle times. Some consignees may be able to provide more lead time on their orders if you ask them. This can allow for combining daily LTL orders into larger shipment sizes and moving them on designated days.

In other cases, intermodal transportation, in some areas, may be an effective option to over the road service, at a significant savings.  For certain Canadian-based companies, they may be able to arrange direct shipping of their products from their US vendors to their Canadian consignees, by-passing their Canadian warehouses in some instances, and reducing cross-docking, re-handling, and line haul costs.

It is critical to identify and implement these efficiencies before conducting a bid. These operational changes will translate into even bigger savings after the bid has been conducted. If necessary, delay the launch of the bid until these changes are made. Keep in mind that your carriers’ rates are tied to freight volumes on specific corridors. If you make these changes after the bid, you run the risk that the carriers will come back and ask for a renegotiation of the rates.

Shippers also need to get their data in order before conducting bid. It is essential that the carriers in the bid be supplied with accurate data upon which they can base their rates. The data should be cleansed to remove errors in weights; the volumes in certain lanes should be corrected to reflect new customers added during the year and the loss of some old ones.

Two other areas to look at are production and inventory management processes. For some shippers, these may be delicate issues to raise with their supply chain partners. Nevertheless, if there are problems with production processes such that the company is required to make excessive use of expedited services, or if cramped warehouses force the company to move suboptimal shipment sizes, these translate into higher than necessary freight costs. Again, these items should be addressed, if possible, before executing the bid.

By making ongoing changes to a company’s supply chain, this ensures that the business is operating as efficiently as possible. By combining these changes with a well organized FRP process, shippers can maximize their savings. For more information on how to conduct a professional freight bid, check out my series of blogs on this topic (http://www.dantranscon.com/index.php/blog/entry/freight-bid-tip-1-obtain-buy-in-and-participation-from-the-operating-divisions ).

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 19 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Donald Trump Freight Recession Canada U.S. trade Railway Association of Canada freight transportation Global experience Scott Monty Climate Change business start-up intermodal Conway Bobby Harris dimensional pricing Schneider Logistics NAFTA the future of transportation 2014 freight volumes Transportation NCC Dedicated Trucking customer engagement Inbound Transportation Career Advice autos tanker cars business security freight rate increases computer protection Warehousing Amazon Digitization freight cost savings FMS Training cheap oil China Microsoft freight costs Ferromex selling trucking companies coaching CN Rail Coronavirus Canadian economy Retail technology freight payment freight audit CITA Shipper Pulse Survey Hockey pipelines automation Business skills shipper-carrier contracts freight transportation in 2011 YRCW RFP Canada's global strategy Transportation service hiring process Leadership Surety bond Right Shoring Finance and Transportation driver Blockchain freight audit Habs General Motors Swift Rate per Mile Regina Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration Otto Colilers International ShipMax freight agreements Werner employee termination future of freight industry Fire Phone TMS David Tuttle Driving for Profit supply chain management Management digital freight matching Hudsons Bay Company IANA MBA Justice Broker Grocery Electric Vehicles Sales Strategy energy efficiency Omni Channel computer Muhammad Ali UP 2014 economic forecast derailments Canada Transcom Fleet Leasing LTL CSX LCV's Freight Matching truck drivers Tariffs CP Rail Derek Singleton Toronto Maple Leafs Trucker Protest US Auto Sales Blogging LinkedIn Associates Truckload shipper-carrier roundtable FCPC Montreal Canadiens bulk shipping Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC dynamic pricing Transplace Whole Foods computer security capacity shortages Stephen Harper Trade Vision Infrastructure ProMiles cars Freight Carriers Association of Canada Crude Oil by Rail Driver Shortage 2015 Economic Forecast Failure Software Advice Transportation Buying Trends Survey Freight Social Media in Transportation CN Packaging NMFC 2013 Economic Forecast 3PL online shopping shipper-carrier collaboration Canadian truckers recession Entrepreneur broker security Load Boards Canadian freight market FCA dark stores Transport Capital Partners (TCP) $75000 bond Accessorial Charges Facebook driver pay Deferred Packaging Tracy Matura Geopolitics KCS USA Truck Toronto Freight Management Sales Training trucking company acquisitions 360ideaspace Dan Goodwill Global Transportation Hub shipping wine Covid-19 CSA 3PLTL Celadon BNSF Comey Digital Freight Networks Sales Freight contracts President Obama small business freight marketplace Education BlueGrace Logistics Consulting New York Times risk management Sales Management laptop Trump financial management Government truck capacity Dedicated Contract Carriage Shipper Success failure entrepreneur 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad freight forwarders autonomous vehicles home delibery 2014 freight forecast Social Media Business Development University of Tennessee Transloading Business Strategy Freight Rates Adrian Gonzalez Cleveland Cavaliers Leafs Yield Improvement robotics fuel surcharge Map-21 economic forecasts for 2012 mentoring Twitter Distribution TransForce Rotman School of Business freight RFP Carriers Trucking marketing FuelQuest USMCA EBOR Harper Davos speech Masters in Logistics asset management Outsourcing Sales US Housing Market Value Proposition Online grocery shopping freight payment small parcel Uber Freight TMP Worldwide solutions provider trade US Manufacturing Job satisfaction APL CSA scores cyber security Freight Shuttle System Retail transportation peak season Life Lessons driverless consumer centric Anti-Vax MPG FMCSA Crisis management carrier conference e-commerce freight broker JB Hunt US Election routing guide home delivery transportation audit Search engine optimization Wal-Mart drones Canadian Protests driver shortages transportation newspaper ELD capacity shortage professional drivers freight transportation conference shipping Reshoring natural disasters Training New Hires Doug Davis Canadian Transportation & Logistics economy rail safety Impeachment Keystone Pipeline truck driver buying trucking companies Politics network optimization Loblaw broker bonds NS US Economy Load broker economic outlook Business Transformation Strategy Spanx Success Doug Nix CRM last mile delivery freight bid Freight Capacity Emergent Strategy Rail transportation news

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January