Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Freight Bids
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2243
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Shippers, Watch Out for Unprofessional Freight Bid Service Providers

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_9496237.jpg

The subject of online freight bids and internet freight auctions came up a few times at the Surface Transportation Summit that took place in Toronto on October 13. The carriers that raised this topic spoke of the high volume and poor quality of bids that have been hitting the transportation industry this year. One carrier was so fed up with the internet auctions in which they were participating that they made a decision to opt out of them.

It is clear that where there is a market opportunity, there are a multitude of companies that are seeking to meet the needs of unsuspecting shippers. It was apparent from the carrier comments that there are a number of unqualified or underqualified, unprofessional providers, some with very limited expertise, who are providing an unsatisfactory service to their customers and a disservice to the industry. These are some of the issues that were brought to light.

There are bids on the market where the carrier is being asked to quote on 6000 lanes of traffic, a massive undertaking. In one case, the carrier was provided with shipment data that stated that there are 1600 truckloads of freight that move on a particular lane each year. The carrier that is the incumbent, looked at their data and noticed that they move only 160 LTL shipments on the particular lane each year.

The company conducting the bid advised the carrier, after round 1, that their rates were 25 percent too high and that they need to adjust their rates to remain in the bid. They also mentioned that this was going to be a four round bid.

The carriers are also being advised that there will be no face to face contact. All of the bidding will take place online. What can be gleaned from this data?

A lot. First, to conduct a quality bid exercise, the carriers have to be supplied with accurate and complete data on shipment volumes, weights, loading and unloading processes and a host of other information. With poor quality data, the shipper is assured of Garbage In/Garbage Out.

Second, carriers very rarely have 25 percent margins on their freight. To think that a new carrier can move the freight for twenty-five percent less than the incumbent and that there will be pressure to reduce these rates even further over a four round process casts significant doubt on the expertise of the bid manager and the quality of carriers they plan to engage to serve the shipper. It also begs the question of the integrity of the company conducting a bid. You don’t often see a twenty-five percent reduction in rates after one round of bidding. Unless a shipper has tens or hundreds of millions of dollars of freight, a four round bid exercise is ridiculous.

Third, the carriers that receive bid awards are going to be a shipper’s key supply chain partners. While price is important, so is on-time service, the quality of their IT capabilities, their safety record, the size and quality of their fleet, the experience of their management team, and a range of other variables. While internet auctions are common for a variety of industries, it is absolutely essential that shippers make decisions on partners based on a full understanding of their capabilities and performance. While it possible to make a decision, online, about a carrier that receives a handful of shipments a year, it is critical for shippers to personally engage with carriers that are receiving major, and in some cases, minor bid awards.

The Bottom Line

My company has conducted dozens of professional and successful freight bids over the past 13 years. These kinds of problems do not occur when you work with us or one of our quality competitors. There are clearly a number of companies that don’t know what they are doing.

In recent years, we have observed a number of companies that sell shippers on conducting an internet freight auction, at no charge. They earn their fees by getting the shipper to agree to a percentage of the savings that are achieved. The problem is that when a bid is conducted in a slipshod way, the projected savings aren’t real. They don’t materialize. The carriers start handling the freight and realize that the volumes and shipment weights aren’t correct. If the business is awarded to low service carriers, they start to fail on service very quickly. Within a few weeks, the carriers come back and ask for rate increases. The shippers then bring back their incumbent carriers in the hope that they will handle the freight. The freight bid service provider walks away with a nice fat fee. The shipper is red-faced, higher management is justifiably upset, people often lose their jobs and the carriers are aggravated about losing the freight they took so much time to bid on and secure. Nobody wins.

Buyer beware. Some unqualified and unscrupulous companies have come to the freight bid provider industry. Do your due diligence before you hire an outsider to conduct your next freight bid.

 

If you need help with a freight bid, call me at 416 932 9701 or send me an e mail at dan@dantranscon.com. To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 28 March 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

the future of transportation Stephen Harper Trade Vision driver shortages Hockey transportation newspaper David Tuttle Shipper shipping TMS economic forecasts for 2012 Grocery Canadian Transportation & Logistics financial management asset management freight payment freight audit Loblaw LCV's Colilers International FMS Value Proposition Toronto Maple Leafs small business Freight contracts Comey capacity shortage computer security Infrastructure Canadian economy BlueGrace Logistics Leadership economic outlook routing guide Accessorial Charges selling trucking companies Spanx Failure natural disasters truck driver NCC Surety bond 3PLTL TransForce Transportation service Swift trucking company acquisitions Freight Capacity Global Transportation Hub carrier conference Railway Association of Canada Social Media in Transportation Toronto peak season Canada Regina Rotman School of Business Distribution CITA Shipper Pulse Survey freight forwarders bulk shipping energy efficiency dimensional pricing Canadian Protests Training Blockchain Packaging freight agreements future of freight industry Freight Matching Canada's global strategy Hudsons Bay Company Masters in Logistics Success failure entrepreneur truck capacity Trucking President Obama robotics US Auto Sales Outsourcing Sales Transportation Buying Trends Survey 2013 Economic Forecast US Manufacturing Habs Celadon Werner Cleveland Cavaliers Freight dynamic pricing freight audit LinkedIn Justice supply chain management Management Career Advice Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC Impeachment US Economy recession Trucker Protest 360ideaspace computer protection YRCW 2014 freight forecast Rate per Mile Transport Capital Partners (TCP) Crisis management shipper-carrier roundtable Social Media 2014 freight volumes freight broker Politics New York Times Electric Vehicles freight costs freight transportation conference computer Sales Management CN trade broker security Twitter ProMiles intermodal Geopolitics TMP Worldwide Bobby Harris buying trucking companies USA Truck Scott Monty digital freight matching transportation news Otto Finance and Transportation Consulting FCA Sales Strategy Freight Shuttle System professional drivers rail safety Right Shoring Climate Change Software Advice Digitization $75000 bond Reshoring technology home delibery Life Lessons University of Tennessee Search engine optimization RFP CP Rail Canadian truckers freight transportation BNSF Keystone Pipeline Warehousing Map-21 KCS Trump Sales Whole Foods Business Transformation Strategy UP home delivery economy freight RFP Online grocery shopping Global experience Transcom Fleet Leasing Entrepreneur freight marketplace China Tracy Matura APL pipelines Derek Singleton Education risk management Blogging Dedicated Trucking Retail transportation tanker cars Yield Improvement Dan Goodwill Freight Recession Covid-19 Transportation shipping wine broker bonds Adrian Gonzalez FuelQuest IANA Associates 2014 economic forecast autonomous vehicles coaching transportation audit fuel surcharge ELD automation Doug Nix ShipMax CSX Conway Uber Freight Sales Training NMFC Fire Phone MBA Facebook Microsoft NAFTA driver pay CN Rail autos Anti-Vax Amazon consumer centric dark stores small parcel Deferred Packaging EBOR cheap oil Donald Trump Muhammad Ali solutions provider freight rate increases drones business start-up US Housing Market Load broker Canada U.S. trade freight payment Business Strategy Job satisfaction 2015 Economic Forecast e-commerce derailments cars Coronavirus US Election Driver Shortage Canadian freight market Leafs mentoring Inbound Transportation MPG customer engagement Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration LTL laptop Training New Hires employee termination Business Development 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad FCPC Tariffs Government freight cost savings 3PL Emergent Strategy Driving for Profit Transplace freight transportation in 2011 Freight Carriers Association of Canada FMCSA Business skills marketing CSA General Motors Crude Oil by Rail NS Montreal Canadiens Success Doug Davis driverless last mile delivery CSA scores Dedicated Contract Carriage CRM Schneider Logistics Harper Davos speech online shopping Ferromex Broker Retail Digital Freight Networks shipper-carrier contracts shipper-carrier collaboration Omni Channel JB Hunt truck drivers USMCA driver freight bid Carriers hiring process Transloading Load Boards Wal-Mart Truckload cyber security capacity shortages Freight Rates business security Freight Management network optimization Rail

Blog Archives

March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January