Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Freight Bids
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2307
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Get your “House in Order” Before Conducting a Freight Bid

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_49290215.jpg

One of the most frequent complaints I hear from carriers, in person, on social media, or at conferences, is about the number and quality of freight bids that they receive. Carriers complain about the poor quality of the data, the number of carriers in the bid, and about the lack of professionalism in the bid process. They also assert that if the shipper would just meet with them face to face, rather than through a bid process, the result would be more successful for both parties and would take a lot less time, money and effort.

My company has designed and executed many successful bids over the past fourteen years. We have learned that for many shippers, success comes from getting “your house in order” before executing the bid. This is what is involved.

Many shippers have been moving the same freight, to the same consignees, using the same processes, for several years. In their haste to put their freight out for bid, they overlook certain aspects of their business.

A company's product portfolio evolves over time.  New products are introduced as old ones are retired. Miniaturization and packaging changes can have significant impacts on freight densities, and as a by-product, freight rates.  It is essential for shippers to obtain precise calculations of updated product densities before launching a bid exercise.

Businesses change over time. New divisions are added while others may be closed or sold. This may alter freight flows.  Some companies overlook the opportunity to merge their freight with their new sister or acquired divisions to improve their negotiating leverage. In other cases, new pool or consolidation points may evolve.

We sometimes find companies that experience a deterioration in their business volumes. Poor economic or competitive conditions may reduce shipping volumes and leverage. This can necessitate combining volumes with competitive shippers, forming industry associations or taking other creative approaches to make their freight more attractive to carriers.

Shippers should also look at their order fulfillment processes and cycle times. Some consignees may be able to provide more lead time on their orders if you ask them. This can allow for combining daily LTL orders into larger shipment sizes and moving them on designated days.

In other cases, intermodal transportation, in some areas, may be an effective option to over the road service, at a significant savings.  For certain Canadian-based companies, they may be able to arrange direct shipping of their products from their US vendors to their Canadian consignees, by-passing their Canadian warehouses in some instances, and reducing cross-docking, re-handling, and line haul costs.

It is critical to identify and implement these efficiencies before conducting a bid. These operational changes will translate into even bigger savings after the bid has been conducted. If necessary, delay the launch of the bid until these changes are made. Keep in mind that your carriers’ rates are tied to freight volumes on specific corridors. If you make these changes after the bid, you run the risk that the carriers will come back and ask for a renegotiation of the rates.

Shippers also need to get their data in order before conducting bid. It is essential that the carriers in the bid be supplied with accurate data upon which they can base their rates. The data should be cleansed to remove errors in weights; the volumes in certain lanes should be corrected to reflect new customers added during the year and the loss of some old ones.

Two other areas to look at are production and inventory management processes. For some shippers, these may be delicate issues to raise with their supply chain partners. Nevertheless, if there are problems with production processes such that the company is required to make excessive use of expedited services, or if cramped warehouses force the company to move suboptimal shipment sizes, these translate into higher than necessary freight costs. Again, these items should be addressed, if possible, before executing the bid.

By making ongoing changes to a company’s supply chain, this ensures that the business is operating as efficiently as possible. By combining these changes with a well organized FRP process, shippers can maximize their savings. For more information on how to conduct a professional freight bid, check out my series of blogs on this topic (http://www.dantranscon.com/index.php/blog/entry/freight-bid-tip-1-obtain-buy-in-and-participation-from-the-operating-divisions ).

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 19 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Rotman School of Business Training New Hires freight rate increases China Government Right Shoring bulk shipping Regina Job satisfaction US Manufacturing freight marketplace driver shortages General Motors Digital Freight Networks Leadership US Auto Sales Hudsons Bay Company freight payment freight audit Canada's global strategy NAFTA Rate per Mile Load Boards Outsourcing Sales Habs Wal-Mart rail safety $75000 bond Broker ShipMax routing guide Distribution coaching marketing 360ideaspace Business Strategy solutions provider broker bonds Infrastructure Uber Freight dimensional pricing Dedicated Contract Carriage New York Times recession Warehousing 3PLTL BNSF Swift customer engagement technology capacity shortage Scott Monty MPG Transplace Railway Association of Canada economy autos Consulting Sales Management dynamic pricing cyber security freight forwarders Success 2014 economic forecast Value Proposition peak season online shopping Microsoft EBOR Dedicated Trucking Canadian Transportation & Logistics Ferromex Canadian truckers FuelQuest 2014 freight volumes carrier conference Finance and Transportation Geopolitics Tariffs economic forecasts for 2012 freight RFP Freight Shipper freight transportation conference LTL hiring process Amazon NCC driver Surety bond Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC professional drivers transportation audit Blockchain CSA freight payment TransForce Hockey shipper-carrier roundtable consumer centric LCV's Freight Carriers Association of Canada BlueGrace Logistics Freight Rates TMP Worldwide Transportation Colilers International Sales Strategy small business President Obama network optimization Digitization Emergent Strategy Social Media 2013 Economic Forecast trade CITA Shipper Pulse Survey dark stores Map-21 cheap oil Grocery Stephen Harper Trade Vision Electric Vehicles Toronto Doug Davis NS Celadon robotics Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration home delivery US Election Doug Nix Online grocery shopping pipelines Sales Entrepreneur last mile delivery Leafs Canada U.S. trade truck driver Transportation service Bobby Harris shipper-carrier contracts freight cost savings Driving for Profit Whole Foods computer security Success failure entrepreneur natural disasters intermodal capacity shortages 2015 Economic Forecast LinkedIn CN Rail US Housing Market Freight Capacity risk management Canada laptop 3PL shipping truck capacity Freight Shuttle System Global experience CRM Politics Yield Improvement Loblaw Life Lessons financial management Business Transformation Strategy asset management digital freight matching Transcom Fleet Leasing Muhammad Ali Sales Training Otto Freight contracts Harper Davos speech Canadian freight market freight transportation Fire Phone IANA Donald Trump Freight Management Software Advice Tracy Matura NMFC Failure Canadian economy computer protection Training Blogging CSX Twitter Justice Career Advice selling trucking companies Retail buying trucking companies APL freight audit Impeachment Montreal Canadiens computer business start-up Business Development RFP Omni Channel Transportation Buying Trends Survey Social Media in Transportation Derek Singleton Canadian Protests Global Transportation Hub transportation newspaper energy efficiency freight bid Masters in Logistics Freight Recession Crisis management Driver Shortage Facebook Toronto Maple Leafs Business skills CP Rail small parcel drones YRCW freight broker Retail transportation JB Hunt freight costs cars FMCSA driver pay Coronavirus Management transportation news FMS UP Adrian Gonzalez Trump Load broker automation business security CSA scores Cleveland Cavaliers Carriers Accessorial Charges ProMiles tanker cars TMS Werner Associates Trucker Protest Transport Capital Partners (TCP) Education shipper-carrier collaboration Conway trucking company acquisitions e-commerce USMCA FCA Keystone Pipeline the future of transportation supply chain management Schneider Logistics freight agreements Dan Goodwill Deferred Packaging Search engine optimization 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad derailments CN Rail USA Truck broker security Trucking 2014 freight forecast freight transportation in 2011 David Tuttle Spanx future of freight industry Crude Oil by Rail truck drivers Transloading Reshoring autonomous vehicles Anti-Vax KCS FCPC MBA University of Tennessee ELD employee termination Inbound Transportation Comey Truckload mentoring economic outlook Packaging US Economy Climate Change shipping wine Covid-19 fuel surcharge driverless Freight Matching home delibery

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January